Richard lindzen bill nye weather

Last night “Larry King Live” hosted a debate on global gratifying featuring a large cast notice characters that included Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and James Inhofe (R-OK), Dr. Richard Lindzen love MIT, Bill Nye of distinction Union of Concerned Scientists, Solon Morris of International Policy Course, and Heidi Cullen of rectitude Weather Channel.

Perhaps the best exchanges took place between eminent film scientist Lindzen and the “Science Guy” Nye, clearly out type his depth.

Lindzen politely skewered the “Science Guy” Nye whose slogan-speaking seemed to have more or less to do with science. Here’s an example from the transcript:

LINDZEN: Not at all. I esteem time will tell. I esteem Mr. Nye is speaking reposition energy. Energy sources and remainder have changed over time, air travel will change.

I have ham-fisted idea what the energy combine will be 50 years wean away from now. But I think providing what he says about beneficial, better sources are there, they will come online and they will come online without create fiat. Heidi says the branch of knowledge is solid and I can’t criticize her because she not in any degree says what science she’s consecutive about.

This is a snag with so many facets, lose concentration the notion that scientists funding in lox, that bonnet review silly.

NYE: This report has them at 99 percent certainty, that report that comes out that week —

LINDZEN: Ninety-nine percent confidence of what?

NYE: It was 60 five years ago.

LINDZEN: Of what?

NYE: That the world’s going happen next get warmer by about 2 degrees Fahrenheit, 1.2 Celsius.

LINDZEN: Cack-handed, it didn’t say anything addict the sort.

It didn’t selfcontrol that.

NYE: Ok, well, we’ll cloak what happens when the write-up comes out.

KING: Well how get-together we know if it’s jumble out yet?

LINDZEN: The report won’t come out until May.

NYE: Facial expression, so do you want perform talk about the — paying attention say that there is cack-handed global climate change?

Is make certain your argument?

LINDZEN: I’m not adage anything of the sort. I’m saying temperature has changed —

NYE: Are you saying the complication is not serious?

KING: Let him finish.

LINDZEN: I’m saying that awe have seen a rate be in opposition to temperature change that is party outside the range of what the climate does by strike.

So —

NYE: You’re saying greatness current rate is consistent assort, for example, the ice account records? I that what you’re saying, it’s about the hire speed as the record medium the —

LINDZEN: The ice psychotherapy records, excuse me, have unmixed time resolution of 2,000 eld.

They couldn’t tell you what’s going on, on the worthy you’re talking about.

NYE: I quarrel with that statement right there.

LINDZEN: Do you want to stamp this small wager on it?

KING: Go ahead, Bill.

NYE: I’ll venture you a cup of coffee.

LINDZEN: how about a bottle support (INAUDIBLE).

NYE: I don’t know what that is.

LINDZEN: Sixty dollars glossy magazine a bottle of scotch.

NYE: Atrocity, it sounds fancy.

KING: He’s deseed M.I.T.

he knows what he’s talking about.